Debt-for-nature swaps: the real deals, the funds they created and how to apply

120 matching capital sources on the AESFIP database · Last checked November 2026

A debt-for-nature swap lets a country refinance part of its debt on cheaper terms in exchange for binding commitments to protect nature. The savings are paid into a conservation fund that finances protected areas, marine reserves and community conservation for years or decades.

Swaps are negotiated by governments, conservation organisations, banks and development finance institutions — projects cannot apply for one. But the conservation trust funds they create run regular grant calls. This guide explains the mechanism, the main precedents, and how local organisations and developers reach that money.

Find the right route for your project

Ask iSustain Advisor Live about debt-for-nature swap proceeds for your country, sector, stage and ticket size. The question is pre-filled — just add your project details.

How a debt-for-nature swap works

Modern swaps follow a similar sequence:

  • Existing government debt, often expensive bonds or loans, is bought back below its face value.
  • The purchase is funded with new, cheaper debt — usually a bond or loan backed by political risk insurance or a guarantee from a development finance institution, which lowers the interest rate.
  • Part of the debt-service savings is paid into a conservation trust fund or endowment.
  • The government signs measurable conservation commitments, such as protecting a share of its ocean or forest, monitored over the life of the deal.
  • The trust fund issues grants and investments to conservation projects, usually through competitive calls.

Precedents: the deals that defined the market

The first debt-for-nature swap was arranged in Bolivia in 1987 by Conservation International. In the 1990s and 2000s, the US Tropical Forest Conservation Act supported a series of bilateral swaps that funded forest conservation in Latin America, Asia and Africa.

The modern model started with the Seychelles in 2018. The Nature Conservancy helped restructure about $21.6 million of the country's debt, created the Seychelles' Conservation and Climate Adaptation Trust (SeyCCAT), and the government committed to protecting 30% of its ocean — a target it met in 2020.

Larger 'nature bond' deals followed. Belize (2021) bought back its main international bond at a discount, financed by new debt with US International Development Finance Corporation political risk insurance, in exchange for marine protection commitments. Ecuador (2023) refinanced about $1.6 billion of debt to fund conservation of the Galápagos marine reserve, and Gabon (2023) completed a similar ocean-focused swap backed by a blue bond.

Who arranges swaps

Swaps involve a small group of actors: the government and its debt office; a conservation organisation that designs the commitments (The Nature Conservancy's Nature Bonds programme has led many recent deals); investment banks that arrange the new debt; and a credit-enhancement provider such as a development finance institution or multilateral development bank. Multilateral banks are increasingly involved in debt-for-climate and debt-for-development versions of the same structure.

How projects actually benefit

The money reaches projects through the trust fund, not through the swap itself. SeyCCAT, for example, runs grant rounds for marine conservation and blue economy projects in the Seychelles. Other national conservation trust funds — such as BIOFUND in Mozambique and the Foundation for Protected Areas and Biodiversity of Madagascar — show how endowment-style funds finance local organisations over many years.

If your country has signed, or is negotiating, a swap: identify the trust fund that will receive the proceeds, its governance board and its funding priorities, and prepare projects that deliver the commitments the government has made. That is where the grant calls will focus.

Risks and criticisms to understand

Swaps are not free money, and the structure has limits:

  • Debt relief is usually small relative to a country's total debt.
  • Transaction costs and the length of negotiations are high.
  • Conservation commitments must be monitored and enforced for many years.
  • Local communities need a real say in how protected areas are designated and managed.

The funders

Each profile shows mandate, instruments and sector appetite. Verified contacts and application routes are available to members.

  • Members only
  • Members only
  • Members only
  • Members only

Showing 12 of 120 matching capital sources. The remaining 108 — including their verified routes, ticket sizes and eligibility criteria — are reserved for members.

Get matched shortlist for your project

Knowing a funder's name is only 10% of the battle. iSustain Advisor Live finds the best-fit financiers and instruments for your project, the clearest route in, and how to approach them — based on your country, sector, stage and capital requirement.

Common questions

What is a debt-for-nature swap?
An agreement in which a country's debt is refinanced on cheaper terms, and part of the savings is used for conservation under binding government commitments.
Can a conservation project apply for a debt-for-nature swap?
No. Swaps are sovereign transactions. Projects benefit by applying to the conservation trust fund that receives the proceeds, usually through competitive grant calls.
Which countries have done debt-for-nature swaps?
Recent examples include the Seychelles (2018), Belize (2021), Barbados (2022), Ecuador (2023) and Gabon (2023), alongside earlier swaps in Latin America, Asia and Africa going back to Bolivia in 1987.
What is the difference between a debt-for-nature swap and a blue bond?
A blue bond raises money for ocean projects. In recent swaps, a blue bond or loan is often the new, cheaper debt used to buy back the old debt, so the two can be part of the same deal.

Related guides

Official sources: The Nature Conservancy — Nature Bonds · SeyCCAT — Seychelles' Conservation and Climate Adaptation Trust. Reviewed by the iSustain Global research team against funders' published criteria.